Skip to content

Double fallacy: Kovačević, Ljubić and paralegal stretching of the boundaries of court decisions

This text is published in the Bosnian language in a similar form at Prometej. Introduction: paralegal stretching of court decisions as a political tool In the following lines, I will address the phenomenon of “paralegal stretching” of court decisions — a practice in which final and binding court rulings, under the guise of subsequent and … →

Two Recent Strasbourg Judgments Against Bosnia and Herzegovina: Extending the Prohibition of Ethnic Exclusion in Access to Public Office

Introduction The judgments delivered by the European Court of Human Rights on 3 February 2026 in Begić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina and Begić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (No 2) represent another important development in the Court’s anti-discrimination jurisprudence concerning the constitutional order of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In both cases, the Court found a violation of … →

The Strasbourg Barometer: Assessing the State of Human Rights Protection in South-East Europe in 2025

In 2025, the European Convention on Human Rights commemorated its 75th anniversary. For the legal community, this milestone is not merely ceremonial; it represents three-quarters of a century of building a “common public order” across the continent. Yet, for the nations of South-East Europe, the data from this anniversary year serves less as a celebration … →