Editor’s Picks

• The Strasbourg Barometer: Assessing the State of Human Rights Protection in South-East Europe in 2025
• Behind AI as a tool for judicial reasoning: A Western Balkans Perspective
• The Judge is Their Own Executioner: How Constitutional Judges’ Self-Decisions on Their Own Terms of Office Endanger the Montenegrin Rule of Law
• When a Government Lacks Constitutional Title: U-29/25, Acting Authority, and Executive Legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina
• External militant democracy: The case of Bosnia & Herzegovina
• Can a ‘Militant’ Court Be Trusted? Judicial Appointments and Romania’s Constitutional Court after the 2024 Electoral Crisis

Latest Articles

• Can a ‘Militant’ Court Be Trusted? Judicial Appointments and Romania’s Constitutional Court after the 2024 Electoral Crisis
• External militant democracy: The case of Bosnia & Herzegovina
• Two Recent Strasbourg Judgments Against Bosnia and Herzegovina: Extending the Prohibition of Ethnic Exclusion in Access to Public Office
• Operationalising Fundamentals: Rule of Law Conditionality in the EU Growth Plan
• The Strasbourg Barometer: Assessing the State of Human Rights Protection in South-East Europe in 2025

Trending Topics

• External militant democracy: The case of Bosnia & Herzegovina
• The Strasbourg Barometer: Assessing the State of Human Rights Protection in South-East Europe in 2025
• Two Recent Strasbourg Judgments Against Bosnia and Herzegovina: Extending the Prohibition of Ethnic Exclusion in Access to Public Office
• The Judge is Their Own Executioner: How Constitutional Judges’ Self-Decisions on Their Own Terms of Office Endanger the Montenegrin Rule of Law
• When a Government Lacks Constitutional Title: U-29/25, Acting Authority, and Executive Legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina